Tap Into Your Emotions

A group of gardeners once gathered to test a brand-new irrigation system. One gardener proudly said, "Let's run the water in a straight line down the middle. If it flows clear and strong, then surely the system works."

Everyone nodded - after all, the middle path is clean, simple, and reassuring. The plants along that line sparkled with life.

But an older gardener frowned. She walked to the corners of the field. There, the soil was dry, untouched by the water. She kicked over a stone and found roots tangled in thirst. Then, she asked, "What happens when a storm floods the field? What if the pipes clog with mud, or the valves rust? What if children come to play and bend the spouts? What will embarrass us most when the neighbors come to see?"

The group sighed. They realized the system hadn't truly been tested. The happy path only told half a story. The garden's health depended on the difficult paths - the stressful, scary, greedy, embarrassing, and more.

So they drew upon their emotions as their guide:

• Scary: What feared scenario haunts each stakeholder?
• Angry: What harsh inputs make the system lash out?
• Embarrassing: What tiny flaw would cause red faces in public?
• Greedy: What happens when too much is demanded at once?
• Forgetful, Indecisive, Desolate, Stressful, Delinquent… each emotion revealed another risk, another uncovered corner of the garden.

By walking these emotional paths together, the gardeners uncovered failures early, sparked new conversations, and left no root to dry unseen.

Testing is not only about logic, coverage, or technique - it's also about empathy. When we tap into our emotions, we see risks we would otherwise overlook. That's the real strength of shaded figs: it reminds us that software isn't just code, it's a garden of human hopes, fears, and frustrations.

Prevent Problems: They Are Hard to Fix

Once, in a small village nestled between rolling hills, there lived a wise old carpenter named Eli. He was known for his beautiful furniture and sturdy structures. Villagers often marveled at how his creations stood the test of time while others fell apart.

One day, a young apprentice named Jonah approached Eli and asked, "Master, what is your secret? How do you make such lasting works?"

Eli smiled and replied, "Let me tell you a story."

In the same village, there was another carpenter named Ben who rushed through his work. He would often ignore the cracks in wood or skip reinforcing joints because he believed speed was more important than quality. One sunny afternoon, Ben built a grand table for the village feast but neglected to check if the legs were properly secured.

As everyone gathered around for the celebration, laughter filled the air. But suddenly, with one heavy thud on its surface from an excited villager's hand, the table collapsed! Food spilled everywhere as people gasped in shock.

Meanwhile, Eli had been quietly crafting a simple yet sturdy table for himself at home. He took time to select only the finest wood and reinforced every joint meticulously. When he heard about Ben's mishap at the feast, he invited everyone over to enjoy his own creation - one that could withstand any excitement without faltering.

Jonah listened intently as Eli continued: "You see my young friend; preventing problems takes patience and care. Just like I choose strong wood and reinforce my tables before they are needed; we must also take our time to prevent issues before they arise."

"Fixing problems after they occur is always harder," Eli added thoughtfully. "It requires more resources and effort than simply doing things right from the start."

From that day forward, Jonah learned not just about carpentry but also about life - the importance of prevention over reaction.

The villagers began to apply this wisdom beyond their crafts; they started nurturing relationships with care instead of letting misunderstandings grow until they became rifts too wide to bridge.

So remember: like Eli's tables that stand firm through joy and laughter when built with intention - so too can our lives flourish when we focus on preventing problems rather than scrambling to fix them later on.

Key Takeaway

Taking time today to prevent future issues will save us much heartache tomorrow. Choose quality over haste in all aspects of life!

Snoop on the Competition: Learning from Other People's Mistakes

One day, three fishermen sat by the river.

The first cast his net and said, "I only watch my own line. I don't care what anyone else catches. If I focus hard enough, I'll surely bring in the biggest fish."

The second laughed. He looked over at the fisherman downstream, saw him struggling to pull in his line, and said, "That rock always breaks the nets. He's about to lose his catch. I'll cast my net upstream instead."

The third fisherman quietly walked along the shore, studying where the reeds broke, where the currents swirled, and where fish had slipped from others' nets. Then he cast exactly once - and came back with a basket full of fish.

The Point of the Story

In software, too many teams behave like the first fisherman: focused only on their nets, their modules, their scope of control. They're diligent but blind to the lessons unfolding downstream.

But the cheapest problems to fix are the ones someone else already discovered.

Your competitors have already stumbled on rocks in the river - bugs, failures, outages. If you're paying attention, you don't need to stumble on the same ones.

How to "Snoop" the Right Way

• Regulatory Reports: In regulated industries, detailed problem reports are public archives. They're goldmines of "what can go wrong."
• Social Media & News: Customers are quick to share their frustrations online. Even a Twitter rant can point you to a hidden testing scenario.
• Support Forums: Many companies run customer Q&A boards and even semi-public bug trackers. Every unanswered complaint is a test idea waiting for you.
• Fake Post-Mortems: Take a competitor's public failure, pretend it happened to you, and run a retrospective. What would have let that slip through?

Closing Thought

You don't always need to cast your nets in deeper waters. Sometimes, you just need to watch where others' nets have torn. By snooping smartly, you protect your product from repeating history - and your users from catching the same old rocks.

Because in testing as in fishing: the wisest catch isn't the one you fight hardest for. It's the one you didn't lose in the first place.

Decouple Coverage from Purpose

A story for QA:

A farmer once owned two fields. In one, he planted wheat; in the other, corn.

When the wheat began to sprout, the farmer wanted to know if the soil was good. Instead of walking into the wheat field and testing the soil there, he brought in oxen, plows, and workers. He had them plow both fields, water them, and wait weeks to see how both wheat and corn responded.

The farmer eventually learned that yes, the wheat field soil was fine—but he wasted time, water, and effort, and the corn crop was trampled in the process.

His neighbor, seeing this, simply scooped a handful of soil from his wheat field, tested it directly, and moved on. The neighbor learned what he needed without disturbing the other crops.

The farmer shook his head. “I wanted to know only about the wheat—but I tested the whole farm.”

Lesson for QA

Many QA teams fall into the same trap. They confuse coverage (what part of the system you’re exercising) with purpose (what you’re trying to learn).

• To check if one service talks to the database, they create sprawling end-to-end tests that drag in half the system.
• To verify a business rule, they go through the UI when the real logic lives in a single function.
• To prove acceptance criteria, they think they must run API tests—even if unit-level tests would suffice.

Like the farmer plowing the entire farm to check one field, the team wastes time, energy, and resources. The result? Slower tests, higher maintenance, and broader failures than necessary.

The lesson: decouple coverage from purpose.

• A business rule can be tested at the unit level.
• A technical check can be run end-to-end.
• The goal defines the test’s purpose; the system level defines the coverage.

When you separate these two, you’ll find your testing becomes faster, clearer, and far more effective.

The Parable of the Bridge Builders

Explore Capabilities, Not Features: A Parable for QA Testers

Imagine a builder, hammer in hand, proudly showing off the house he had just completed. "Look at this kitchen," he said, "with its state-of-the-art appliances. And the bedrooms are spacious, just as requested. The bathrooms are luxurious, with all the modern fixtures."

The quality inspector nodded, checking off each item on their list. "Yes, everything matches the specifications perfectly."

But when the homeowners arrived, their excitement turned to disappointment. "Why is the kitchen so far from the dining area?" one asked. "It's going to be a hassle carrying hot dishes back and forth."

"And these bedrooms," another added, "they feel stuffy. Is there no way to get some fresh air in here?"

The inspector, puzzled, looked back at their checklist. Everything was correct, yet something was missing.

Then, the inspector had an idea. Instead of just checking features, they decided to experience the house as a homeowner would. They imagined waking up, getting dressed, making breakfast, and relaxing in the evening. As they walked through these scenarios, they noticed the inconveniences and discomforts.

"Ah," the inspector thought, "I see now. It's not just about the features; it's about how they enable people to live comfortably."

From then on, the inspector explored the capabilities of the house, ensuring it truly met the needs of those who would call it home.

The Lesson for QA

In software QA, features are like the rooms in that house - specific functionalities we're asked to test. But capabilities? They're about what users can do with the software, how it fits into their lives, and how it solves their problems.

When we base exploratory testing on new features or user stories, it's easy to fall into tunnel vision. We end up checking if the feature works as expected, rarely straying off the path. But exploratory testing shines when it tackles the unexpected - those hidden risks that don't show up on a checklist.

Focusing on capabilities gives us a broader yet focused lens. It's not just "Does this button work?" but "How does this help users achieve their goals?" By exploring what the software enables - or prevents - testers can uncover issues that feature-focused testing might miss.

Takeaway

So the next time you're exploratory testing, don't just tick off features. Step into the user's shoes and explore the capabilities those features provide. Balance the scope - neither too narrow nor too wide - and you'll deliver software that's not just functional, but truly valuable.

Describe What, Not How: The Story of the Two Chefs

Let me tell you a story.

There were once two chefs tasked with preparing a meal for a grand feast. The first chef, eager to impress, handed his apprentice a step-by-step scroll: “Chop the onions this thin, heat the pan to just this temperature, add everything in this order…” He explained every dash and sprinkle. His apprentice, overwhelmed, spent more time deciphering instructions than cooking. The meal, though technically precise, lacked flavor and joy.

The second chef took a different approach. She told her apprentice, “Tonight, we must serve a soup that warms the soul on a cold night, that smells like coming home.” She described the experience she wanted the diners to have, the outcome—not the process.

The apprentice chose his own path, using what he knew and could discover, tasting as he went. He focused on the warmth, the comfort, the delight. His soup was a triumph. The guests were moved. No one asked how it was made.

The Lesson

When we write acceptance criteria - or any instructions - there’s a desire to dictate every step. But in doing so, we risk the creativity, losing sight of our purpose, and tripping over complexity. Focus on what you want to achieve - the outcome, the experience, the why. Trust the team to discover the how. Describe what soup to serve, not how to stir the pot.

That’s the recipe for long term QA success.

Connect Four Game for QA

As a QA Engineer, your day revolves around precision, problem-solving, and spotting patterns before they become issues. It's mentally taxing work that demands sharp focus and creative thinking. While coffee breaks and team huddles are great, there's an unexpected hero for keeping your mind in top shape: a Connect Four game in the break room. Here's why this classic game is a must-have for QA teams.

Hones Strategic Thinking

Connect Four is deceptively simple - drop discs, get four in a row. But winning requires anticipating your opponent's moves, planning several steps ahead, and adapting on the fly. These are the same skills QA engineers use when designing test cases or debugging complex systems. A quick game sharpens your ability to think strategically under pressure, a critical skill when hunting for elusive bugs or optimizing test coverage.

Boosts Pattern Recognition

QA engineers excel at spotting anomalies and patterns in software behavior. Connect Four trains your brain to recognize alignments - horizontal, vertical, or diagonal - while predicting how the board evolves. This mirrors the process of identifying edge cases or potential failure points in code. A few rounds during a break can fine-tune your knack for seeing the bigger picture, helping you catch defects others might miss.

Encourages Quick Decision-Making

In Connect Four, every move counts, and hesitation can cost you the game. This fast-paced decision-making translates directly to QA work, where you often need to prioritize test scenarios or make judgment calls on defect severity. Playing Connect Four builds confidence in making swift, calculated choices, which is invaluable when deadlines loom or production issues arise.

Relieves Stress While Keeping You Sharp

QA work can be intense, with tight deadlines and high stakes. A quick Connect Four match offers a mental reset without numbing your brain like scrolling social media might. It's engaging enough to distract from work stress but light enough to leave you refreshed. Plus, the friendly competition fosters camaraderie among team members, boosting morale and collaboration.

Fosters Team Bonding and Communication

QA teams thrive on clear communication and collaboration, whether it's discussing test plans or triaging bugs. Connect Four brings colleagues together in a low-pressure setting, encouraging banter and teamwork. These interactions build trust and improve how the team collaborates on complex projects, all while having fun.

A Low-Cost, High-Impact Investment

Unlike fancy break room perks like ping pong tables (which we had) or VR setups, Connect Four is compact, affordable, and requires no maintenance. It's easy to set up, quick to play, and accessible to everyone, regardless of gaming experience. A single game can fit into a 10-minute break, making it a practical addition to any QA team's workspace.

Conclusion

A Connect Four game in the break room isn't just a fun diversion - it's a brain-sharpening tool that aligns perfectly with the skills QA engineers use daily. From strategic planning to pattern recognition and quick decision-making, this classic game keeps your mind agile while fostering team spirit. So, next time you're stocking the break room, skip the vending machine upgrades and grab a Connect Four set. Your QA team's sharpness (and maybe their win streak) will thank you.

Want to level up your break room game? Try tracking team Connect Four tournaments to see who's the ultimate QA strategist!

Blocked ARIA-Hidden Errors: Why Focus Matters for Accessibility

<div aria-hidden="true">
 <button>Click me!</button>
</div>

<div inert>
 <button>Click me!</button>
</div>

<!-- Main content -->
<div id="main-content" class="container my-5">
 <h1>Welcome to My Site</h1>
 <button class="btn btn-primary" data-bs-toggle="modal" data-bs-target="#myModal">Open Modal</button>
</div>
<!-- Modal -->
<div class="modal fade" id="myModal" tabindex="-1" aria-labelledby="modalLabel" aria-hidden="true">
 <div class="modal-dialog">
 <div class="modal-content">
 <div class="modal-header">
 <h5 class="modal-title" id="modalLabel">My Modal</h5>
 <button type="button" class="btn-close" data-bs-dismiss="modal" aria-label="Close"></button>
 </div>
 <div class="modal-body">
 <p>This is the modal content.</p>
 <input type="text" class="form-control" placeholder="Enter text">
 </div>
 </div>
 </div>
</div>

const mainContent = document.getElementById('main-content');
const myModal = document.getElementById('myModal');
myModal.addEventListener('show.bs.modal', () => {
 mainContent.setAttribute('inert', '');
});
myModal.addEventListener('hide.bs.modal', () => {
 mainContent.removeAttribute('inert');
});

Test in Production Meme

In QA, the phrase "test in production" is often met with a mix of laughter and dread. A popular meme circulating since July 9, 2019, captures this sentiment perfectly. Featuring a house engulfed in flames with the words "in this house we test in production," this image has become a humorous yet cautionary tale for QA professionals and developers alike.

The Meme Explained

The image depicts a simple house drawing with flames surrounding it, symbolizing chaos or disaster. The text "in this house we" is overlaid on the structure, leading to the bold declaration "test in production" at the bottom, accompanied by more flames. The humor lies in the absurdity of testing software in a live environment, where real users are affected, rather than in a controlled setting.

The Reality of Testing in Production

While the meme is funny, for me, it touches on a real issue. Testing in production happens more often than an team would admit - due to tight deadlines, overlooked bugs, or inadequate testing environments. This practice can lead to crashes, data loss, or frustrated users, much like the fiery chaos depicted. QA professionals advocate for robust pre-launch testing, including unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance testing, to avoid such scenarios.

Lessons for QA Teams

This meme serves as a reminder of the importance of a solid QA process:

• Pre-Production Testing: Ensure all features are tested in a staging environment that mirrors production.
• Monitoring: Implement real-time monitoring to catch issues early if production testing is unavoidable.
• Culture Shift: Foster a culture where cutting corners is discouraged, and quality is prioritized.

Conclusion

The "test in production" meme is a lighthearted jab at a serious topic. While it may elicit a chuckle, it also underscores the need for diligence in quality assurance. Let's keep the flames where they belong - in the meme, not our live systems! Share your own QA horror stories or laughs in the comments below.